Another Euro Crisis? Here's What Markets Are Saying About Italy
Italy’s stocks and bonds came under intense pressureon Friday, with the plunge in the country’s banks wiping $10 billion off their market value. Those who remember the chaos of the euro region’s sovereign debt crisis will be asking, whether this is the start of something much worse. Here’s what financial markets are telling us.
Bond Risks
The selloff in the nation’s 10-year bonds drove yields up the most since May -- a time when the Five Star Movement and the League parties were forming their coalition, and holding talks with euroskeptics who had floated the idea of leaving the euro area. The good news is that the hard-line rhetoric has faded somewhat, meaning the concern in markets is about the size of Italy’s debt load, rather than the risk that it leaves the currency bloc.
This is reflected in Italy’s 10-year yield spread over German bunds. That gauge is hovering at around 270 basis points, still short of the year’s highs of around 323 basis points. And this week’s selloff has been relatively orderly in comparison with the sudden, illiquid lurches that were seen in May.
Much could depend on how the credit-rating companies respond to the 2.4 percent deficit projection. Both S&P Global Investors and Moody’s Investors Service re due to review Italy over the course of the next month, and both have the nation just two notches above a junk rating. Foreign investors could flee if Italy loses its investment-grade status, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
The budget deficit unveiled by Italy’s government isn’t disastrous for the country’s public finances, according to Bloomberg Economist David Powell. With a shortfall of 2.4 percent, the nation’s ratio of debt-to-gross domestic product should stay under control, he estimates. However, the European Commission would like Italy to pay off the debt at a faster pace.
Taking Stock
Italy’s banks took a battering Friday, with trading in some the biggest names -- UniCredit SpA, Intesa Sanpaolo SpA, Banco BPM SpA -- being halted at least once during the course of the day. The FTSE Italia All-Share Banks Index fell as much as 8.6 percent, the most in over two years, and representing a market wipeout of around 9 billion euros.
The problem for Italy’s banks stems from the fact that they are the biggest buyers of the country’s bonds, also known as BTPs. When those securities drop as rapidly as they did Friday, it hurts the banks that own them -- a phenomenon known as the sovereign-bank “doom loop.” That brings back memories of the euro-area debt crisis.
While the country’s financial institutions hold by far the most state obligations among lenders in Europe, one factor in banks’ favor is that their balance sheets are much improved since 2011. In addition, so long as the nation retains an investment-grade credit rating, banks are able to access liquidity from the European Central Bank if funding becomes scarce.
No Cold, Yet
The euro fell as the bond market reaction rippled through into the region’s banking sector, but declines were also distorted by an appreciating dollar. Prospects for the currency still look bright as the ECB moves closer to its first deposit-rate increase since 2011, at a time when the euro area is posting a current-account surplus.
Meanwhile, evidence of contagion to other markets was limited. The bonds of peripheral countries such as Spain and Portugal barely budged -- a far cry from the days of the debt crisis, when turmoil that started in Greece eventually forced other nations including Ireland and Portugal to seek bailouts, and toppled Italy’s government.
“It’s going to hang over markets for a while, but it’s not disastrous,” said Kit Juckes, global strategist at Societe Generale SA, who expects the euro to stay within a tight range. “We won’t get proper clarity for a while, and this is really only the start of the fiscal debate. Though we can say with some confidence that apart from the deficit-GDP ratio being below 3 percent, the EU’s fiscal rules will be broken.”
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has been spotted on GeekBench and the numbers are in. This time, it's the Exynos 9820 variant for South Korea (SM-G973N), and there are notable differences with the previously seen results from the S10+ in Snapdragon 855 trim . The single-core result, in particular, is far ahead of any other chip in the Android world - the current Kirin 980 (around the 3400s) and Snapdragon 845 (ballpark is in 2400s) are no match for the next-gen Exynos, and early Snapdragon 855 figures are much lower too (3400-3550 depending on who you ask). In fact, the older Exynos 9810 gets closest, posting single core results upwards of 3600 and into the high 3700s under the right conditions. Even so, the iPhone XS remains out of reach. GeekBench 4.1 (single-core) Higher is better Sort by Label Sort by Value Apple iPhone XS Max 4777 Samsung Galaxy S10 (E9820) 4382 Samsung Galaxy S9+ 3771 Samsung Galaxy Note9 3642 Samsung Galaxy S10+ (S855) 3413 Huawei Mate 20 Pro 329...
The Chandigarh Consumer Commission recently ordered Bata India Ltd to pay ₹ 9,000 in fine for charging ₹ 3 from a customer for a paper bag to carry the shoebox. Legal experts say the order is legally valid across the country and that stores cannot charge consumers additional charges for the bag if the product is purchased from the same store. The forum's order came on a complaint filed by a consumer, Dinesh Prasad Raturi. Raturi told the consumer panel that he had purchased a pair of shoes on February 5 from the shoe store located in Sector 22D. The store charged ₹ 402, which also included cost for the bag. Raturi contested that by charging him for the bag, Bata was also endorsing its brand on the bag which was not justified. Raturi sought a refund of ₹ 3 and compensation for deficiency in services. The forum slammed Bata for charging an additional amount for the paper bag. The forum ordered that a customer cannot be compelled to pay for...
Google might be the king of search right now, but it's not an easy task staying at the top. Aside from being efficient enough to convince users to come to them, Google also occasionally has to make sacrifices. Sometimes, that's a $9 billion sacrifice to maintain its monopoly. According to a Business Insider report, courtesy of Goldman Sachs analyst Rod Hall, Google will pay Apple approximately Rs 65,000 crore in 2018 in order to remain the Safari browser's default search engine. That number will also climb to $12 billion in 2019 (approximately Rs 87,000 crore). If that seems like an unreasonable amount to pay for such intangible benefits, think again. After all, Safari is the default browser on everything from the iPhone, to the iPad and Mac. A lot of those users actually prefer Apple's browser to other options, meaning Google would in turn be generating a really high amount of ad revenue from searches. According to Goldman Sachs, the fee Google pays ends up be...
Comments
Post a Comment